Intent
The system knows what outcome it is serving.
Paweł Szóstakowski / AI automation & agentic systems
Production AI workflows, multi-domain platforms, autonomous narratives, and agent-connected infrastructure.
I design and build systems that observe state, coordinate agents, make bounded decisions, and remain open to human intervention. This site documents the architecture, operating principles, and working projects behind them.
Engineering model
Six responsibilities that have to work together in a governed autonomous system.
The web as a system that keeps observing and deciding after deployment.
Explore the thread ↗Agents act inside explicit authority, review gates, and reversible states.
Explore the thread ↗Content composed from goals, evidence, relationships, and current context.
Explore the thread ↗Interfaces that change with state without concealing why they changed.
Explore the thread ↗Specialized roles cooperating through contracts instead of one opaque model.
Explore the thread ↗Build logs, failure modes, overrides, and what survived contact with reality.
Explore the thread ↗Controlled publishing loop
The essential distinction is between producing a candidate and authorizing a public state change.
A request, observation, or dated source enters with provenance.
Evidence is gathered before a model is asked to compose.
Generation produces a reviewable proposal, never the final truth.
Claims, links, scope, voice, and risk are checked explicitly.
A human or policy gate changes publication state.
The published result remains measurable, reversible, and correctable.
Minimum viable governance
Quality is not a property of the model alone. It emerges from constraints, state, evidence, and a credible way to intervene.
The system knows what outcome it is serving.
Every actor has a visible boundary on what it may change.
Decisions can be traced back to sources and system state.
A person can inspect, stop, or replace a decision.
Publication is a state transition that can be undone safely.
Failures become constraints for the next run, not hidden anecdotes.
Evidence from working systems
Working systems turned broad design principles into concrete engineering requirements: durable state, bounded authority, traceable evidence, explicit publication states, human intervention, and safe reversal.
Explore the case studiesSelected reading
Field note
Why an autonomous content pipeline still needs human override, observable decisions, and a hard boundary between producing a draft and making it public.
Field note
A build log about the assumptions that failed, the problems hidden by technically correct pages, and what a multi-domain experiment taught me about autonomy.
Field note
Automation repeats a designed path; autonomy adapts under intent and constraints. The organism metaphor is useful only if it does not hide ownership, infrastructure, or human...
Field note
A dated, public-evidence case study of limina.li: what its expanding narrative graph demonstrates, what can be inspected today, and what the experiment does not yet prove.
Field note
Trading algorithms and recommender systems are not one category of autonomy, but both reveal how objectives, feedback loops, scale, and weak intervention can turn local success into...
Latest state
New case studies and engineering notes document how the systems evolve in practice.